Updated: Cell-cultured meat remains focus of new laws and legislation across the Midwest

May 4, 2026
|


 

Midwestern state legislatures continued to consider and pass legislation on cell-cultured meat in the second half of the 2025-2026 biennium. A previously published legislative tracker and Midwest map (see below) have been updated and is current as of May 4, 2026. 


 

As of April 2026, most states in the Midwest had laws of some kind on “lab-grown meats,” though they vary in scope and intent. Some of the new statutes place temporary or permanent bans on production and sales. Others establish packaging and labeling requirements or prohibit state and/or local entities from purchasing cell-cultured meats.

Background on legislative, regulatory actions

Derived from the muscle tissue cells of a live animal, cell-cultured meat is grown in laboratories. The cell-cultured meat industry remains in a pilot commercialization phase.

In summer 2023, the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food Safety and Inspection Service authorized the sale of cell-cultured chicken produced by two California startups. It marked the first-ever approval by the federal agency. Later that year, for a brief period, this lab-grown meat was part of the menu at two U.S. restaurants. (As of April 2026, lab-grown meats were not being produced for consumption or sale in the United States.)

In 2024, Florida and Alabama became the first U.S. states with statutory bans on the sale and production of cell-cultured meat. Soon after passage of the Florida measure, a California startup (UPSIDE FOODS) brought a case challenging the law’s constitutionality.

In 2025, Nebraska became the first Midwestern state to prohibit the sale or manufacture of cultivated protein food products (LB 246). The law’s prohibition is based on classifying cultivated protein food products as “adulterated,” thereby making their sale or manufacturing a deceptive trade practice.

Legislative activity in Midwest: 2025

In 2025, bills were introduced in Illinois, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio and South Dakota to prohibit in-state production and sales of cell-cultured meat. Proposed legislation that year in Indiana and Minnesota focused on labeling restrictions. Here is an overview of enacted laws from that year.

  • Two bills were signed into law in South Dakota in February 2025: HB 1022, which adds labeling requirements, and HB 1118, which prohibits state funding for research, production, promotion, sale or distribution of cell-cultured protein.
  • North Dakota HB 1151 changed significantly prior to being signed into law in April 2025. The measure initially prohibited in-state consumer sales and production of cell-cultured protein. The enacted legislation requires a study of the regulatory landscape of implementing a prohibition on cell-cultured protein.
  • Indiana HB 1425 also underwent significant changes before being signed into law in May 2025. The initial bill required a study of the product’s safety and placed a one-year moratorium on sales. The enacted measure places a two-year moratorium on the sale and manufacturing of cultivated meat products. The measure also addresses labeling requirements.
  • Nebraska LB 246 was signed by Gov. Jim Pillen in May 2025. The enacted measure, predicated on a 2024 executive order, passed without significant changes during the legislative process. It prohibits the manufacture and sales of cultivated-protein food products by classifying the product as “adulterated food.”
  • In December 2025, Ohio HB 10 was signed into law. It establishes packaging and labeling requirements for cultivated-protein food products and penalties for violations. The measure also prohibits schools and institutions of higher education from purchasing cultivated-protein food products.

Legislative activity in Midwest: 2026

In 2026, Midwestern legislatures again introduced new bills to restrict, regulate or ban lab-grown or cell-cultured meats. Here is an overview of some of the significant legislative actions.

  • South Dakota legislators (SB 124 of 2026) have placed a five-year prohibition on the sale, manufacturing and distribution of any cell-cultured protein. This action followed passage of a 2025 law requiring clear labeling of such products and prohibiting the use of state funds for their research or production (HB 1022). Also in 2026, Gov. Larry Rhoden vetoed HB 1077. That measure classified cultivated protein as adulterated food, which would have effectively prohibited its sale or distribution. A legislative attempt to override the veto was unsuccessful.  Lawmakers also failed to pass HB 1109, which proposed a 10-year prohibition on the sale or manufacture of cell-cultured protein.
  • In Wisconsin, Gov. Tony Evers vetoed AB 554, which would have restricted the sale of lab-grown meat unless appropriately labeled. The bill also sought to prohibit schools and other state institutions from serving lab-grown meat, with limited exceptions.

Becky Leis, staff liaison for The Council of State Governments’ Midwestern Legislative Conference Agriculture & Rural Affairs Committee, wrote about the issue of lab-grown meats in early 2025, examining how and why legislatures were addressing the issue for an article that appeared in the CSG publication Stateline Midwest. She has since been tracking legislative activity over the 2026-2026 biennium.

Read the full Stateline Midwest article from January 2025

 

 

Comparative chart: Legislative approaches in Midwest

Cell-cultured meat laws in the Midwest
Cell-cultured meat laws in the Midwest
StateBill NumberDescriptionEnacted
Illinois HB 3701 and HB 4261Creates an Alternative Protein Innovation Task Force Act to explore the potential of protein derived from plant-based, fermented, or cell-cultured sources and to assess the economic, environmental, health, and food security impacts of the alternative protein industry and recommend state support strategies. 8/11/2023 and 8/9/2024
IowaSF 2391Establishes strict labeling requirements for alternative protein food products, prohibits their misbranding as traditional meat or egg products, and enforces these rules through inspections, penalties, and purchasing restrictions by state institutions. 5/23/2024
Kansas SB 261Prohibits the use of identifiable meat terms on labels of meat analogs unless terms are properly qualifyed. The law specifies conditions under which food is deemed misbranded. 7/1/2022
North Dakota HB 1400Restricts labeling and product packaging of cell cultured proteins. Creates penalties for violations. 3/12/2019
South DakotaSB 68Expands definition of misbranding food to include falsely, deceptively, or misleading labeling a product as a meat food product. 3/29/2019
IndianaHB 1425Establishes a two-year moratorium on the manufacturing or sale of cultivated meat products. Establishes regulations to prevent the misbranding of cultivated meat products as traditional meat, requiring clear labeling and authorizing penalties for violations.5/6/2025
OhioHB 10Prohibits schools and institutions of higher education from purchasing cultivated-protein food products. Requires opt-out provision if product is approved for purchase by the USDA for benefit recipients. Creates labeling and packaging requirements and civil penalties for violations.12/19/2025
South DakotaSB 1118Prohibits state funds used for research, production, promotion, sale or distribution of cell-cultured protein.2/27/2025
NebraskaLB 246Amends the Nebraska Pure Food Act establishing labeling and advertising requirements for food products that resemble meat but are derived from non-animal sources, such as cultivated, insect, or plant proteins. Products must be stored separately from actual meat products in food establishments.5/20/2025
North DakotaHB 1151Requires a legislative management study regarding regulation of cell-cultured protein and litigation of state prohibitions at the state and federal level.4/24/2025
South DakotaSB 124Temporarily prohibits the manufacture, sale, or distribution of any product containing cell-cultured protein. Prohibition effective from July 1, 2026, through June 30, 2031.3/12/2026
South DakotaHB 1022Mandates clear labeling of cell-cultured protein products to prevent misbranding and ensure consumer transparency.2/11/2025
Midwest meat production: By the numbers

The United Nations’ Food and Agriculture Organization estimates that by 2032, global consumption of meat proteins will be 13 percent higher compared to levels at the beginning of this decade. That is significant for the 11-state Midwest region, which boasts 39.4% of total U.S. cash receipts for animal and animal product commodities.  This table identifies the amount of meat production and U.S. ranking for the 11-state region.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cell-cultured meat: The production process

Cell-cultured meat is a product derived from animal muscle tissue that is scaled up in the lab by using a combination of growth factors, adherent cells and nutrients to form a tissue that resembles meat, according to Josephine Wee, a professor of food science at Penn State University who researches the product.

For further details about the production of cell-cultured meat, here is a link to a podcast interview with Dr. Wee.

Cell-cultured meat: Midwest legislative tracker (2025-2026)
StateBill NumberDescription (last updated 5/4/2026)Primary Sponsor(s)Date IntroducedLast ActionLast Action Date
IllinoisHB 0015 Creates the Illinois Cultivated Meat Act prohibiting the manufacture, sale and distribution of cultivated meat. Defines violations as a Class C misdemeanor and establishes enforcement by the Department of Agriculture.Rep. Chris Miller1/9/2025Referred to Committee1/9/2025
MichiganHB 4083Prohibits the sale of cultivated meat. Enhances food labeling requiremetns and increases penalties for violations.Rep. James DeSana2/12/2025Introduced2/12/2025
South DakotaHB 1022Mandates clear labeling of cell-cultured protein products to prevent misbranding and ensure consumer transparency.House Agriculture Committee1/14/2025Signed by Governor2/11/2025
South DakotaHB 1109Prohibits in-state sale, distribution and manufacureing of cell-cultured meat for a 10-year period.Rep. John Sjaard and Rep. Jana Hunt1/28/2025Failed Senate vote2/20/2025
MichaganHB 4076Requires specific labeling for meat and meat substitutes.Rep. Jerry Neyer2/12/2025Advanced to Senate Committee5/15/2025
South DakotaHB 1077Amends state law to classify all cultivated-protein food products as adulterated food effectively prohibiting sale or distribution within the state.Rep. Julie Auch1/16/2026Veto override failed3/30/2026
South DakotaSB 124Temporarily prohibits the manufacture, sale, or distribution of any product containing cell-cultured protein. Prohibition effective from July 1, 2026, through June 30, 2031.Rep. John Sjaarda1/26/2026Signed by Governor3/12/2026
MinnesotaSF 1188Defines cell-cultured products and requires a label for such products sold in stores or restuarants.Sen. Torrey Westrom2/10/2025Referred to committee2/10/2025
NebraskaLB 246Amends the Nebraska Pure Food Act to prohibit cultivated-protein food products by classifying them as adulterated, thus making their manufacture and sale a deceptive trade practice.Sen. Barry DeKay1/14/2025Signed by Governor5/20/2025
NebraskaLB 658Amends the Nebraska Pure Food Act establishing labeling and advertising requirements for food products that resemble meat but are derived from non-animal sources, such as cultivated, insect, or plant proteins. Products must be stored separately from actual meat products in food establishments.Sen. Bob Anderson1/7/2026Carryover Bill1/7/2026
South DakotaHB 1118Prohibits state funds used for research, production, promotion, sale or distribution of cell-cultured protein.Rep. Jana Hunt and Rep. Aaron Aylward1/29/2025Signed by Governor2/27/2025
MinnesotaSF 239
HF 2170
Defines cell-cultured meat and poultry terms and provides parameters for labeling such products in stores and at restaurants.Sen. Rich Draheim1/16/2025Amended, passed committee3/17/2026
North DakotaHB 1151An act requiring a legislative management study regarding regulation of cell-cultured protein and litigation of state prohibitions at the state and federal level. Rep. Mike Schatz and Rep. Ty Dressler1/7/2025Signed by Governor4/24/2025
WisconsinAB 554
SB 560
Restricts sales and serving of cell-cultured meat unless appropriately labeled. Prohibits serving cell-cultured meat to students, patients and inmates with limited exceptions.Rep. Clint Moses10/15/2025Vetoed by Governor3/27/2026
OhioHB 10Prohibits schools and institutions of higher education from purchasing cultivated-protein food products. Requires opt-out provision if product is approved for purchase by the USDA for benefit recipients. Creates labeling and packaging requirements and civil penalties for violations. Restraints also apply to fabricated eggs.Rep. Roy Klopfenstein and Rep. Jack Daniels1/23/2025Signed by Governor12/19/2025
IndianaHB 1425Establishes a two-year moratorium on the manufacturing or sale of cultivated meat products. Establishes regulations to prevent the misbranding of cultivated meat products as traditional meat, requiring clear labeling and authorizing penalties for violations.Rep. Beau Baird1/13/2025Signed by Governor5/6/2025
IndianaHB 1345Introduces labeling requirements for cultivated (lab-grown) meat and insect protein products, mandates clear identification on packaging and civil penalties for noncompliance.Rep. Randall Culp1/6/2026Referred to committee1/6/2026
"]